Something Smells

ASP.Net Frustration It's very hard to articulate "why" I am frustrated with ASP.Net. Recently, I found a post that, while not articulating the "why", does articulate the feeling: I think what annoys me the most is that I really like C#. It’s a great language, and the .Net framework is awfully well put-together. I really enjoy spending time with C#, but then along comes ASP.Net like the loud, overbearing, half-drunk uncle at a family reunion, tips over our picnic basket, and ruins everything. - Deane I've tried exploring this subject on many occasions and come to the conclusion that it is a subject best discussed over a pitcher of beer! Before I go on I must give thanks to the guys (and gals?) at the castle project and their incredible Rails Framework Monorail . So, ASP.Net is frustrating. To be fair to many who have bought into ASP.Net, ASP.Net sells itself very well. As a technology it is very heavily driven by marketing needs. The MS sales force wanted...

Castle Project and Monorail I just wanted to give a quick nod to the guys at the Castle Project ! We've started converting one of our major applications to their Monorail framework. For those of you unfamiliar with Castle or Monorail, Monorail is an MVC framework for .Net web applications. It completely replaces the webforms framework with a much simpler (and more powerful) rails style implementation. The project includes an OR Mapper (ActiveRecord) that uses NHibernate as it's back-end. Their ActiveRecord implementation greatly reduces the time it takes to map objects to the database. They support several view engines based on Nvelocity, Boo (brail), string template, and some others. They also have a basic generator for scaffolding and a basic migrations framework is being developed. If you are in a .Net shop and looking to take advantage of Rails/MVC or if you are just fed up with the overengineered webforms model then check out Monorail! Here is a link to my Castle bookmarks...

If you didn't know then I'll tell you now...... I am a huge proponent of XP . I don't much care for Scrum.....it just doesn't work for me, deal with it. I recently read an article " Should a ScrumMaster Give Performance Appraisals? " For those of you who are unfamiliar, a scrummaster is the same as the XP coach. My first thought was, "who else is really qualified?" My second thought was, "yeah, who else is qualified?!" Now, I'm not a big "Performance Appraisals" kinda guy. Just seeing the words makes me feel kinda sick. I've rarely written a performance appraisal that I didn't wish I could change later. Even when I was in the Army (yes I was in the Army for 12 years) we prepared many "Performance Appraisals" called Evaluation Reports. If it was a good soldier we scowered the last years calendar for good stuff he had done. If it was a bad soldier we scowered their folder for negative things to say. All sa...

I just read an interesting article that breaks down the Agile planning process into 5 levels : (This is slightly modified) The Vision The Roadmap The Next Release The Next Iteration The Next Day Essentially, each agile planning session occurs in one of these levels. With each level dependent on it's predecessor. Ideally, you need a vision before you have a road map, road map before you plan the next release...you get the idea. This really made sense to me. For years now I've used a somewhat complicated model to describe what it is we do. This model, oddly enough, can be easily distilled into this 5 level process. In the table below I have identified each level of planning with WHAT being the expected artifact and the WHO generally describing the participants: Level What? Who? The Vision A Vision Statement Chickens The Roadmap Roadmap (duh) Chickens The Next Release Rele...